top of page

PRP vs. Stem Cell Therapy: What’s the Difference and Which Is Right for You?

  • Writer: Dr John Hong
    Dr John Hong
  • Jun 30
  • 2 min read

John K. Hong, M.D. | 6/30/2025


PRP vs MSC? Which one is best?
PRP vs MSC? Which one is best?

Regenerative medicine has revolutionized how we treat chronic pain, arthritis, and soft tissue injuries—without surgery. Two of the most promising biologic therapies are Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) and Stem Cell Therapy, specifically Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs). While both promote healing, they work differently and are suited for different stages and types of conditions.


What Is Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP)?


PRP is derived from your own blood. After drawing a small amount, it’s spun in a centrifuge to concentrate the platelets in plasma. These platelets are rich in growth factors that stimulate the body’s natural repair processes.


Advantages of PRP:

  • Autologous and low-risk – No immune rejection.

  • Cost-effective and convenient – Often done in a single office visit.

  • Rapid preparation – Minimal processing required.

  • First-line therapy for a wide range of orthopedic and spine conditions.

  • Low regulatory hurdles as it is minimally manipulated.


Disadvantages of PRP:

  • Limited regenerative power – Enhances healing but doesn’t replace tissue.

  • Variable efficacy – Results depend on platelet concentration and total dose.

  • Shorter duration of benefit in advanced degeneration.


What Are Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs)?


MSCs are multipotent cells collected from bone marrow, adipose tissue, or birth tissues. They can differentiate into cartilage, bone, and soft tissue, and secrete powerful anti-inflammatory and reparative signals that modulate the healing environment.


Advantages of MSC Therapy:

  • Regenerative capacity – Can aid in actual tissue repair.

  • Anti-inflammatory effects – Beneficial in degenerative and autoimmune conditions.

  • Longer-lasting outcomes – Especially for chronic and advanced disease.

  • Second-line treatment after PRP has failed or proven insufficient.


Disadvantages of MSC Therapy:

  • More expensive than PRP and typically not covered by insurance.

  • Invasive harvest (e.g., bone marrow aspiration or fat liposuction).

  • Stricter regulation – Especially for expanded or allogeneic cells.

  • Patient-dependent quality – Stem cell potency may decline with age or illness.



Appropriate Indications for PRP and MSCs

Condition

PRP Recommended

Stem Cell Therapy Recommended

Mild to moderate osteoarthritis

✅ First-line

✅ if PRP fails

Severe osteoarthritis

✅ First-line, may havelimited benefit

✅ if PRP fails or ineffective

Degenerative disc disease

✅ First-line, may have limited benefit

✅ if symptoms persist

Chronic tendinopathy

✅ First-line

✅ if refractory to PRP

Ligament or meniscal injury

✅ (mild/moderate)

✅ (complex or failed PRP)

Autoimmune joint conditions (off-label)

❌

✅

Post-surgical recovery optimization

✅

✅ (select cases)


Summary: When to Use PRP vs. Stem Cells


PRP is often an excellent starting point—even for more advanced conditions like severe osteoarthritis and degenerative disc disease—thanks to its safety, ease, and affordability. However, in cases where PRP fails to deliver sufficient relief, stem cell therapy may offer a more robust and longer-lasting regenerative solution.


Ready to Explore Your Regenerative Options?


At Parkview Pain and Regenerative Institute, we specialize in advanced biologic therapies like PRP and stem cells, tailored to your diagnosis and goals. Whether you're managing early joint wear or looking for alternatives to surgery for more advanced degeneration, we’re here to help guide you toward the most effective, evidence-based treatment.



bottom of page